Joseph Isangura
Prominent lawyer Peter Madeleka has raised concerns over the continued detention of Dr. Wilbrod Slaa, citing delays in court proceedings caused by the presence of visiting presidents.
Dr. Slaa, a former politician and outspoken figure, is currently facing charges of spreading false information. His case has sparked widespread public interest, particularly after Madeleka revealed that his client will remain in custody until January 30, 2025, due to logistical issues stemming from high-profile visits.
In a post shared on his X (formerly Twitter) account, Madeleka expressed frustration with the judiciary. “According to the Deputy Registrar of the High Court of Tanzania, Dar es Salaam Zone, Dr. Wilbrod Slaa will remain in custody because ‘there is a visit by presidents.’ This is a clear denial of justice for detainees,” he wrote.
He added, “Justice delayed is justice denied. The judiciary should adopt online court systems to ensure detainees are treated fairly, regardless of external events.”
Also Read: World Bank Prez Arrives In Dar For African Energy Summit
Dr. Slaa was arrested on January 10, 2025, at his home in Mbweni and charged with disseminating false information through the X platform. After his appearance at the Kisutu Resident Magistrate’s Court, his bail application was denied, leaving him in custody while his legal team continues to challenge the decision.
Madeleka and his team have filed two key applications with the High Court in Dar es Salaam. These applications seek to overturn the denial of bail and question the legitimacy of the charges brought against Dr. Slaa.
The legal team has expressed concern over the recent delays, arguing that the judiciary must prioritize the rights of detainees and ensure proceedings are not hindered by logistical or political factors. “Virtual court systems can prevent these unnecessary delays,” Madeleka emphasized.
The judiciary has not yet responded to these concerns, and the delay has reignited public debates about the balance between hosting national events and upholding the rights of individuals awaiting trial.
Dr. Slaa’s continued detention and the circumstances surrounding his case have drawn criticism from human rights advocates and legal experts, who see it as a test of the country’s commitment to justice and freedom of expression.
