The Tanzanian government has rejected a recent CNN report alleging police shootings and mass graves following the disputed October 29, 2025, elections, calling the coverage “one-sided” and professionally flawed.
According to CNN, its investigation drew on interviews with more than 100 Tanzanians, forensic audio analysis, video comparisons, and satellite imagery. The network reported that security forces had fired on largely unarmed civilians and that some victims were buried in unmarked mass graves. CNN emphasized that all evidence was carefully verified before publication and noted that no authority had publicly disputed the findings since the report’s release.
Responding to the allegations, Tanzania’s Chief Government Spokesperson, Gerson Msigwa, said a full review of the claims is underway. He criticized CNN for not contacting government officials before publishing and for using mobile phone images without proper verification. “Journalism should represent all sides. While we are deeply saddened by any loss of life, publishing content that inflames public anger is irresponsible,” he said.
Also Read; States Sue Trump Over Education Funding Freeze
The government has also established an independent commission of inquiry, led by a retired chief justice, to examine the post-election events. Authorities said the commission will review all allegations, including claims of secret burials, and issue a detailed report once complete.
The unrest followed elections in which opposition candidates faced significant restrictions, triggering widespread protests and reports of fatalities. Human rights groups allege that hundreds of citizens may have been killed during the unrest. The situation has drawn international attention, with calls for transparency and accountability.
Observers say the controversy underscores the delicate balance between investigative journalism and ethical reporting during national crises. While satellite imagery and forensic evidence can uncover critical facts, media organizations must ensure fairness, verification, and context, especially when reporting on sensitive events that affect public trust and stability.
