MWE Correspondent
The treason trial of Tundu Lissu, chairman of Tanzania’s opposition party Chama cha Demokrasia na Maendeleo (CHADEMA), commenced today at the High Court’s Masjala Ndogo division in Dar es Salaam, notable for the absence of the accused.
Lissu was not brought to court due to cited security concerns, marking a departure from previous sessions in which he personally appeared to represent himself.
The hearing was presided over by a three‑judge panel led by Justice Dunstan Ndunguru. State Principal Counsel Thawabu Issa informed the court that Lissu’s absence was necessary for safety reasons. Court officials confirmed that they had coordinated with prison authorities, who indicated that Lissu would not be transported for the session. Despite his absence, procedural matters, including the handling of evidence and submissions, proceeded as scheduled.
Lissu, who faces charges related to statements made in the run-up to the 2025 Tanzanian general election, has opted to defend himself in court. His decision to self-represent reflects longstanding concerns about access to legal counsel and the ability to actively participate in his defense.
Also Read; Tanzania’s 13th Parliament Opens Without an Official Opposition
Legal analysts note that his absence today raises questions about ensuring fair trial rights, though the prosecution argued that security considerations take precedence.
Observers say the trial has significant political implications, as Lissu is a prominent opposition figure whose prosecution has drawn national and international attention. The session today primarily addressed procedural issues, including the submission of evidence and verification of the chain of custody for key documents. Both the defense and prosecution remain engaged in detailed legal arguments over admissibility and procedural compliance.
The court has not yet announced the date for the next hearing. Legal experts caution that how the trial progresses — particularly regarding Lissu’s physical absence — could influence both the fairness of the proceedings and public confidence in the judicial process. The trial continues to attract scrutiny as a critical test of Tanzania’s judicial system and political freedoms.
