MWE Correspondent
A high-profile case opened on Thursday in Cameroon’s Yaoundé Military Court, involving 77 individuals detained after widespread protests following the October presidential election.
Among those charged are prominent opposition leaders who had disputed the official results that gave President Paul Biya another term in office.
The hearing, which lasted less than an hour, was adjourned after it became clear that translators were needed for many of the defendants, who speak local languages such as Hausa and Fulfulde. Lawyers representing the detainees raised concerns about procedural fairness, arguing that some had been held for weeks without formal charges or judicial oversight.
Also Read: Global Funding Crisis Puts Sudan Food Aid at Risk
The detentions followed large-scale demonstrations in the capital and other cities after the government confirmed the election results, showing President Biya winning with approximately 53.7% of the vote. Opposition parties and activists described the election as flawed and called for protests, which quickly spread to major urban centers like Douala and Garoua.
Human rights organizations have criticized the authorities’ response to the unrest. Reports indicate that security forces used tear gas and live ammunition during the demonstrations, resulting in casualties and mass arrests. The choice to try civilians in a military court has sparked additional concerns among legal experts and international observers, as military tribunals are generally intended for members of the armed forces rather than civilians accused of political offenses.
Families of the detainees have been following the case closely, while defense lawyers have demanded that the court ensure fair treatment and access to translators in future hearings. International human rights bodies have also called on the Cameroonian government to uphold due process and protect the rights of those detained.
This case highlights the ongoing tensions in Cameroon, where disputes over electoral integrity, political freedoms, and the right to protest continue to fuel unrest. Analysts note that resolving the situation peacefully and ensuring transparent legal proceedings will be critical for the country’s stability and for rebuilding public trust in its democratic institutions.
The next hearing is expected to address the translation issues and procedural concerns raised, as the court moves forward with a case that has captured national and international attention.
