MWE Correspondent
The International Criminal Court (ICC) is taking a significant step forward in one of its most closely watched cases, with a confirmation of charges hearing scheduled for 23 February 2026 against former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte.
The hearing will decide whether there is enough evidence to move the case to a full trial on allegations of crimes against humanity tied to the government’s controversial anti-drug campaign.
Thousands of people were reportedly killed during Duterte’s tenure, prompting international concern and calls for accountability. In January 2026, ICC judges determined that Duterte is medically fit to participate in the proceedings, rejecting arguments from his defense team claiming that his age and health made him unable to stand trial.
Also Read; BRICS Expansion Offers Africa New Financial Opportunities
Legal experts say the confirmation of charges hearing is a crucial milestone. If the judges find sufficient credible evidence, the case will proceed to trial, potentially resulting in formal indictments. For a court often criticized for slow procedures, this marks a moment of renewed action and determination.
Human rights advocates around the world have greeted the news with cautious optimism. Many see the ICC as a vital tool to hold leaders accountable, regardless of their political stature. Families of victims in the Philippines have expressed hope that the court’s intervention will finally bring attention to their suffering, even as domestic avenues for justice remain limited.
Yet the court faces challenges. Some nations, including powerful global players, have questioned its authority and independence. For instance, the United States imposed sanctions in 2025 against senior ICC officials, complicating operations and raising concerns about political interference. These controversies have fed broader debates about perceived selectivity and bias in ICC prosecutions.
Critics argue that too many cases have focused on developing nations, particularly in Africa, leaving others untouched, and have pushed for reforms to ensure fairer treatment across regions. This tension highlights the delicate balance the ICC must strike between pursuing justice and maintaining credibility in the eyes of member states and the international community.
Despite these pressures, the ICC is pressing forward. Observers say the upcoming hearing is about more than one individual; it is a test of the court’s resilience and its ability to uphold international law in a world where geopolitics often intersects with justice. How the hearing unfolds will likely influence both the court’s future and perceptions of global accountability.
For communities affected by past abuses, the hearing represents a small but meaningful step toward recognition and justice. For the international legal system, it is a reminder that accountability, while slow, remains a cornerstone of global governance.
