MWE Correspondent
The Legal and Human Rights Centre has filed Case No. 56/2025 before the East African Court of Justice, challenging the nationwide internet shutdown that affected Tanzania during the 2025 General Election.
The blackout, which lasted from October 29 to November 4, cut off millions of citizens from essential digital services at a moment when online platforms were crucial for communication and access to information.
According to the petition, the shutdown disrupted online banking, telehealth consultations, and emergency communication systems, leaving the public without reliable updates during the voting and results-monitoring process. LHRC says the interruption caused widespread financial losses and created significant social, economic, and security concerns across the country.
The organisation is asking the Court to declare that the shutdown violated principles of good governance and accountability under the East African Community Treaty. LHRC argues that no lawful justification or court order was presented for such a sweeping action, especially during a national election where the public depends heavily on timely access to information.
LHRC is also requesting a permanent injunction to prevent future nationwide internet blackouts unless they strictly follow legal procedures. The organisation stresses that Internet access is now central to civic participation, economic activity, and the protection of fundamental rights — making any interruption a serious matter that requires transparency and accountability.
Also Read; UN Rights Chief Stresses Everyday Importance of Human Rights
“It is expected that once the Attorney General receives formal notice from the Registrar of the East African Court of Justice, he will file a response within forty-five days explaining the legal grounds for the shutdown,” the organisation noted in its public statement.
The case has drawn regional attention at a time when debates around internet shutdowns are escalating globally. Analysts say the outcome could influence how governments within the region handle digital restrictions, particularly during politically sensitive periods.
Many observers believe the ruling could set an important precedent, reinforcing the need for governments to balance national security considerations with the protection of democratic freedoms. The events surrounding the 2025 General Election remain central to the discussion, especially as many citizens continue to question the transparency and implications of cutting off digital communication during an election.
